| |
Prologue
We hope to shape the University's future by means of a strategic planning
effort that considers the relationship between two things -- the institution's
identity, on the one hand, and demographic, market and other societal forces
defining its competitive circumstance, on the other. Of the two, institutional
identity comes first and is the primary focus of this document.
PLU 2000: Embracing the 21st Century emerged from a process which
invited the advice and counsel of every constituency of the University and
which succeeded in attracting the thoughtful attention of many, including the
members of the Board of Regents. Their work is reflected here with as much
faithfulness as seemed consistent with the production of a comprehensible as
well as comprehensive document. It is submitted now to the Board of Regents
for authorization as the official long-range plan of the University.
The undertaking which has eventuated in this document originated in the
presidential selection process launched by the Board of Regents in 1990-91.
That process conferred priority in securing the University's welfare on
long-range planning.
The PLU 2000 planning effort began formally in December, 1992, when President
Loren Anderson commissioned a Long-Range Planning Committee to identify the
focal points of the study and to nominate administrators of the process. Study
commissions were established for eight subjects: Academic Affairs, Student
Life, Enrollment Management, Personnel, Physical Plant, Development, External
Relations, and Finance. Information technology and communication, diversity,
and organizational structure and decision making were thought to constitute
themes of such importance and universality that each commission was asked to
attend to them. Provost J. Robert Wills and Associate Dean of Nursing Carolyn
Schultz accepted the administrative task, and in February and March, 1993, they
enlisted the chairs, co-chairs, and membership of the commissions, each of
which was constituted of faculty, staff, and student representatives. Each
study group commissioned "issue papers"; which were to guide campus-wide
discussion during the academic year 1993-94. In all, 42 papers, many of which
were written collaboratively, emerged from this process, and these were used to
focus discussion at two forums hosted by each study commission during the year.
By early summer, 1994, the commissions submitted their final reports, and a
draft of the PLU 2000 report was then prepared by Professor Schultz and William
Frame, Vice President of Finance and Operations.
From that first draft to this, the authors have been guided by the advice and
helpful criticism of members of the Board of Regents, the panel leaders and
participants in five University forums held in October-November, 1994, and of
the membership of the Long-Range Planning Committee (which reviewed our work on
five occasions since September). We are especially grateful to the authors of
at least a dozen essays submitted this past fall and touching every aspect of
the document. Finally we wish to express our gratitude and that of the
University to Professor Philip A. Nordquist for editing the document, to Vicky
Winters and Opal Huston for preparing and managing publication of the draft and
the original papers, and to the Long-Range Planning Committee for its
encouragement and counsel.
January 9, 1995
|