|
|
|
As noted in the syllabus, the Spring 2007 semester project focuses on the Protect-A-Plate Venture case. This is takes the place of a final exam. In addition to the information given in the case, please incorporate the assumptions in the table below. Use of these assumptions will ensure consistency in your results. Failure to adopt these assumptions will have a significant negative impact on your grade.
Requirements: The minimum requirements for this assignment are as follows (this cannot get you an A on the project; if you do all of these, and do them extremely well, you would probably get a B.)
Remember that quantitative and graphical exhibits do not stand for themselves. They require interpretation and understanding. You cannot assume that bankers will see what you want them to see. Additional credit will be awarded for things like the items below, based on thoroughness, creativity, and quantitative accuracy. Bear in mind that all analyses must be reasonable; for example, it would be highly unrealistic to assume that the market could be double the amount given in the case, or that machine operator costs could be half the amount given.
Discussion of such issues must be supported by appropriate quantitative analysis. Professional presentation is expected. Poorly written, badly organized, sloppy work will receive no credit.
The final is a team or group project. Groups will consist of 2 or 3 [NOT 4] people. Each group will be constituted immediately after spring break. You are free to make up your own groups. I will not serve as a matchmaker. Each group will meet to agree upon their own "rules of engagement," which are to be submitted to me in writing no later than April 17th. Each member of the group must sign the group policies document, which I will retain in the event of a group "blow-up." Your "rules" should address such things as [but are not restricted to] sharing of effort, attendance at meetings and procedures for arranging meetings. In the event of a blow-up, the entire team is to meet with me. At this meeting, I will present you with the document that you all signed and try to get to the root of whatever problems may be occurring. If the problems cannot be resolved, the team has the right to fire a member who is uncooperative, although that action should be a last resort. If your team is experiencing problems, PLEASE report the situation to me BEFORE you get to the "breaking point." I cannot force you to cooperate if you don't want to, but I do insist that major problems be reported to me immediately simply to ensure that I know what is going on. In the event of a "firing," the "firee" will complete the entire project alone. Yes, that means starting over again, even if the "divorce decree" is filed the day before the final is due. Consequently, there are significant incentives for cooperation and learning to work together. [Welcome to the real world. We seldom get to choose our professional colleagues, and we may well wind up working with folks who are irritating or downright nasty.]
|
Copyright © 2008 Gerald M. Myers
|