Working on the Achievement Gap

 

[back to the Tacoma Schools Policy page.]

 

The group who went to the Achievement Gap program at Harvard will be meeting to discuss putting the ideas to work.  Meetings are the Second and Fourth Fridays of the month, 3-5 pm, in the 8th Floor conference room of the Tacoma Schools building (top of the tower).  Some specific meetings:  Nov. 30, 3-5; Dec. 6, 4-6; Dec. 14, 3-5. 

 

This page was prompted by a program at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Closing the Achievement Gap, Nov. 1-3, 2007.  Several people from Tacoma Schools administration and others attended.  This page is a collection of online resources attendees were asked to read, plus material from the people speaking at the program.  Some ideas may influence policy for Tacoma Schools, so the more people in the discussion, the better.  Attendees were given a website address with all the readings, etc. The site requires registration, and they let anyone register…. but most of the material is NOT available to people who did not attend the conference.  Big protected secrets of the guild?  These people are trying to change public policy?  Pathetic, Give me a break….  So, there are other places to find just about everything, noted below. 

 

There is a controversy over the designation of some schools as dropout factories.  A separate page describing the controversy is here.  Johns Hopkins University Center for the Social Organization of Schools focuses on the graduation gap, among other things.  (This was not part of the Harvard program.)  A presentation of their overall approach is here.  They produced the report that uses the term “dropout factory.”  The writing style is somewhat popularized and breezy, and education professionals bristle (or worse) at the term—especially when applied to one of their schools.  The authors’ intent in using the term is to get your attention and encourage changes in policy in the direction of remaking those particular schools.  The data about Tacoma are found here, as are explanations of their methods.  One of their reports:  What your community can do to end its Dropout Crisis.  The dropout crisis was the subject of a conference called the National Summit on America’s Silent Epidemic. 

 

·        A central emphasis of the program is the Harvard Family Research Project.  They have a page listing their research, by subject.  One of the main emphases of the November 2007 workshop was Complementary Learning, or getting families and communities more involved in education.  They have a FINE Network (family involvement network of educators) you can join for free, and they will send you newsletters with toolkit information about making programs happen.  Among their interests:

¨     A study on lessons learned about family involvement in early education. 

¨     A study on Family Involvement in Elementary School Children's Education.  This is to the html version, it has a link to get the pdf version. 

¨     A study on Family Involvement in Middle and High School Students’ Education, also both html and pdf versions. 

¨     A study on effective family-strengthening interventions, in both print formats. 

¨     A study on involvement of low-income working mothers in students’ education, NOTE this is just in pdf format, twenty-some paged in length. 

¨     This study examines how community organizing differs from traditional parent involvement activities, in both html and pdf formats. 

¨     A research report on engaging families in out-of-school-time projects

¨     About 20 cases geared for teaching about family involvement in education. 

 

·        From Columbia Teachers College, the book Class and Schools, by Richard Rothstein, chapter 5, is on the reading list for the program.  You can read an article version of the chapter online, in pdf format.  Here is another Rothstein (coauthored) paper, on conceptual inadequacies in No Child Left Behind standards.

 

·        Pedro Noguera wrote City Schools and the American Dream.  People attending the Nov.1-3 program were asked to read chapter 7 of that book.  His ideas are described in his articles. 

 

·        The Foundation for Child Development is, according to their mission statement, “a national, private philanthropy dedicated to the principle that all families should have the social and material resources to raise their children to be healthy, educated and productive members of their communities. The Foundation seeks to understand children, particularly the disadvantaged, and to promote their well-being.”

 

·        A report of evidence about Family Involvement and Student Outcomes from 2002 (241 pages) summarizes the findings from 51 studies.  A general summary:  When parents talk to their children about school, expect them to do well, help them plan for college, and make sure that out-of-school activities are constructive, their children do better in school. When schools engage families in ways that are linked to improving learning, students make greater gains. When schools build partnerships with families that respond to their concerns and honor their contributions, they are successful in sustaining connections that are aimed at improving student achievement. And when families and communities organize to hold poorly performing schools accountable, studies suggest that school districts make positive changes in policy, practice, and resources.”

 

·        The Economic Policy Institute studies, among other things, the achievement gap.  Rbt. Lynch, one of their scholars, wrote Enriching Children, Enriching the Nation.  One of their reports focuses on progress on the achievement gap, check it.  They respond to controversies over education, such as this one involving the connection between education and economic development. 

 

·        Some folks have worked on an indicator that helps assess policies, THE CHILD AND YOUTH WELL-BEING INDEX.  The challenge is to find meaningful ways to measure the effects of policies on the lives of actual individuals. 

 

·        The Harlem Children’s Zone says the “emphasis of our work is not just on education, social service and recreation, but on rebuilding the very fabric of community life.”  From their website they list this NYT story (14 pgs in pdf format) about their work. 

 

·        The Rochester Children’s Zone is just starting, and is briefly described here.  Its website includes several files describing its planning process.   

 

·        The program also looks at asset mapping. 

¨     Here is a web page describing asset mapping, with a link to a 4-page pdf file of “best practices” in asset mapping. 

¨     Here is another brief web page, with diagrams, describing asset mapping. 

¨     Here is an article by Kretzmann & Green on the toolbox of asset mapping. 

¨     Here is a 35-page powerpoint presentation on asset mapping, from the New Hampshire Institute for Health Policy and Practice. 

 

·        Almost 40 years ago the HGSE founded Project Zero, aimed at enriching education through the arts. 

 

[back to the Tacoma Schools Policy page.]